If I had to pick a favorite philosopher, I would probably
select the 18th-century Scottish intellectual David Hume. Hume is quite rightly a giant in the field,
and his arguments, buttressed by cogent reasoning and a sharp wit, have
maintained influence to this day.
Perhaps one of Hume’s most interesting intellectual
developments was his account of how ideas are generated. Hume held that whatever non-mathematical ideas
we have are ultimately predicated upon experience—upon sense impressions—such
that we cannot imagine anything whose constituents are not elements of our
prior experience.
This account still allows for an explanation of how we can
imagine things that we have not experienced—for example, a golden
mountain. When we have an idea of a
golden mountain, we take two ideas, “golden” and “mountain,” and combine them
in our mind. By the same process, we may
generate ideas of unicorns, ghosts, and most controversially, God. Importantly, however, these constituent ideas
rely on prior experience, so we could not imagine a mountain of a color of
which we are unaware. In this way and in
others, Hume was arguably one of the first to engage in a sort of
proto-psychology.
Hume is also famous for his profound skepticism in denying
our ability to know causation as anything other than extraordinarily high correlation. Furthermore, his demonstration that inductive
reasoning is circular has been a consistent but convincing thorn in the side of
the empirically-inclined ever since.
I could go on about his support of religious toleration or
his commentary on political philosophy, but I believe the ideas I have
presented provide enough reason as to why Hume remains perennially fascinating
and is perhaps my favorite philosopher.
Hi Josh, I am also a fan of Hume's work, especially on correlation and causation. I think these two words tragically get interchanged too often and he was one of the first people to stress that they do not mean the same thing.
ReplyDelete