Well, it looks like Chris Nolan might have been on to something:
it appears that learning via inception may actually be possible.
In this
experiment, Shibata et al. used an fMRI online-feedback method to induce visual
perceptual learning (VPL) in the absence of real and specific target stimuli.
This online-feedback method recorded "activation patterns
corresponding to the pattern evoked by the presentation of a real and specific
target orientation stimulus" in order to repeatedly induce similar
patterns in participants without their knowledge of what was being learned and
without external stimulus presentation. Participants were subsequently
able to perform better in an orientation discrimination task, demonstrating a
causal link between induced specific neural activity patterns and VPL.
It’s hard to read
this paper without wanting to shout "Inception!", but even the
researchers seem to have realized this implication. In the final paragraph, they say that this
fMRI neurofeedback method can "'incept' a person to acquire new learning,
skills, or memory." I personally hesitate in touting the
implications of this paper for the types of learning the authors note, however.
It would seem that the ability to "incept" such learning
depends on the plasticity of the region of the adult cortex in question, and it
is an open question—perhaps out of my own ignorance—as to how plastic certain
cortical areas actually are.
The application of
this method to other areas of the brain, if possible, would carry significant
ethical ramifications: while it would certainly be admirable to augment the
brain in such a way that a person could learn more, it could feasibly be used
to incept certain maleficent ideas into participants. Nonetheless, this
study is a fascinating example of the possible uses of fMRI technology to do
more than simply record brain data.
No comments:
Post a Comment