My interest in the field stems from a desire, rooted in
philosophy, to know how the brain constructs the world around it. To that end, my interest in the neuroscience
of social behavior arises largely from a preoccupation with the manner in which
our brains influence the way we interact in and model social situations.
My particular curiosity regarding the subject was first
piqued when Dr. Harris delivered a guest lecture in my Neuro101 class. The part of the lecture that remains most
prominent in my mind involves how the brain often processes certain individuals—the
homeless, drug addicts, and the like—as something less than human,
neurologically speaking. This type of dehumanization
phenomena continues to fascinate me, for it offers potentially remarkable insight
into how people are susceptible to violating personal codes of ethics and
societal norms when faced with these social outcasts: if the brain literally
does not process them with the same mechanisms as it does for those of a social
in-group—if it does not process them as fully human—this neurological
dehumanization makes it all the easier to mistreat them. Naturally, I’m excited in what this class
offers in regards to the prospect of further insights into how the brain
constructs the world, particularly how this influences our perceptions of other
individuals.
Moreover, and more practically, I am interested in pursuing
a thesis in neuroscience, and the methods-based aspects of this class should
familiarize me with the various methods of the field. In this way, I may have a more fertile
intellectual ground from which to pursue a research question.
Finally, and quite simply and sufficiently for me, neuroscience is fascinating. Why not study it?

I am shocked anyone remembered anything from that guest lecture, but I am glad it stuck with you. In our lab, we have mow demonstrated that anyone can dehumanize anyone else if the context is right (or wrong rather). We can always talk more about these issues during class if you like...
ReplyDelete